Data-driven prospectivity models highlighted structures and zones. Drilling intersected predicted mineralization more often.
Drilling campaigns risked wasting resources on low-prospectivity areas due to limited geological visibility. Traditional mapping and early data could not sufficiently narrow down targets. This increased cost and reduced discovery efficiency.
ML prospectivity models were trained to highlight promising zones based on structural and geochemical patterns. Outputs guided geologists toward areas with higher predicted mineralization.
The models led to successful drilling intercepts within predicted zones, showing direct correlation between ML predictions and mineralization results.
Geological maps, geochem, geophysics, remote sensing